just sayin…

No Dictation

April 30, 2008

Michelle speaks in Indiana very informal…

Filed under: Barack Obama,Election 2008,Michelle Obama — webmaster @ 8:35 pm

Wow the news cycle sucks. Not eloquent but true. Listening to this clip put it back in perspective. Hillary is the token “Women in the White House” at this point with her tactics. Michelle on the other hand is what attracted me to Barack. She is what we need in the White house. Someone who just paid off her student loans. Someone who has to ask her Mom to watch her girls when her work schedule and Barack’s don’t work right. Someone who asks Barack to pick up ant traps on his way home from DC.

• • •
 

April 28, 2008

Must read New York Times: Pentagon propaganda-talking head Generals

Filed under: Media,Torture — webmaster @ 7:50 am

This came out on my birthday, the 20th, so it is a bit behind. I have been listening to Robert Kennedy Jr. and Mike Pappantino talk about it on Ring of Fire on Air America radio. I have to post this. It speaks to everything that is going on.

Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand

In the summer of 2005, the Bush administration confronted a fresh wave of criticism over Guantánamo Bay. The detention center had just been branded “the gulag of our times” by Amnesty International, there were new allegations of abuse from United Nations human rights experts and calls were mounting for its closure.

The administration’s communications experts responded swiftly. Early one Friday morning, they put a group of retired military officers on one of the jets normally used by Vice President Dick Cheney and flew them to Cuba for a carefully orchestrated tour of Guantánamo.

To the public, these men are members of a familiar fraternity, presented tens of thousands of times on television and radio as “military analysts” whose long service has equipped them to give authoritative and unfettered judgments about the most pressing issues of the post-Sept. 11 world.

Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.

Read more

• • •
 

Reverend Wright- The Audacity of Hope

Filed under: Barack Obama — webmaster @ 7:49 am
The 1990 sermon that Obama’s book is titled from
• • •
 

April 24, 2008

The non-Clinton math in a nutshell…

Filed under: Election 2008 — webmaster @ 3:12 pm

Delegate count: if Obama wins anything more than 16% in ANY of the upcoming races he owns the pledged delegates.

Popular vote (which is NOT how you win the nomination but according to Clinton is a means to get the Super Delegates to switch allegiance to her): Clinton math- count Florida AND MICHIGAN as is. That means ZERO votes in Michigan for Obama because he was not on the ballot, then and ONLY then is she ahead in the popular vote. If you count all the votes cast in the states so far and even throw in Florida AND Michigan, but give Obama even less then he usually gets, like the 45% block who chose “undecided” rather than vote for Clinton, he is ahead again.

That Clinton can actually think giving Obama ZERO votes in Michigan is fair is a stunner. More mis-information for her followers which is just going to make it more painful for them to give her up.

• • •
 

April 23, 2008

Clinton wins in perception but still loses in delegate numbers…

Filed under: Election 2008 — webmaster @ 6:41 am
Slate’s Delegate Calculator
THE MATH ONLY GETS GLOOMIER FOR CLINTON—EVEN AFTER A BIG PENNSYLVANIA WIN.
By Chris Wilson and Chadwick Matlin
Updated Wednesday, April 23, 2008, at 1:03 AM ET

Hillary Clinton’s 10-point victory in Pennsylvania awards her a net gain of about 16 pledged delegates, based on projections from the popular vote. Because Pennsylvania awards about two-thirds of its delegates by district, we won’t have a precise figure until later this week.

Coming into today, the odds that Clinton would catch Obama in pledged delegates were very small. Now they’re zero. Before Pennsylvania, Clinton needed to win each remaining primary with 65 percent of the vote to close the gap. Even though she won Pennsylvania, that figure is now just over 68 percent. (Try it on the calculator below by dragging the red bar at the top to the right.) Furthermore, the state with the most remaining delegates is North Carolina, where Obama leads in the polls by about 20 points. Assuming he nets at least 20 more of the state’s 115 delegates, Clinton needs 80 percent of the vote in each of the other eight remaining primaries to catch up.

Read more and play with the flash calculator

• • •
 

April 22, 2008

McCain and his Temper

Filed under: Uncategorized — webmaster @ 2:59 pm

Cenk on the Washington Post article about McCain’s anger issues

• • •
 

April 21, 2008

Tom Frank (What’s the matter with Kansas) new column in the WSJ

Filed under: Uncategorized — webmaster @ 8:29 am
Obama’s Touch of Class
By THOMAS FRANK
April 21, 2008; Page A17

Allow me to introduce myself. According to the general clucking of the national punditry, my 2004 book – “What’s the Matter With Kansas?” – is supposed to have persuaded Barack Obama to describe the yeomanry of Pennsylvania as “bitter” people who “cling to guns or religion or . . . anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” Mr. Obama’s offense is so grave that the custodians of our national consensus have elevated it to gatehood: “Bittergate.”

In truth, I have no way of knowing whether some passage of mine inspired Mr. Obama’s tactless assertion that the hard-done-by clutch guns and irrationally oppose free-trade deals. In point of fact, I oppose many of those trade deals myself.

But I know one thing with absolute certainty. The media flurry kicked up by Mr. Obama’s gaffe powerfully confirms an argument I actually did make: That as they return again to the culture war, what the soldiers on all sides are doing is talking about class without actually addressing the economic basis of the subject.

Consider, for example, the one fateful charge that the punditry and the other candidates have fastened upon Mr. Obama – “elitism.” No one means by this term that Mr. Obama is a wealthy person (he wasn’t until last year), or even that he is an ally of the wealthy (although he might be that). What they mean is that he has committed a crime of attitude, and revealed his disdain for the common folk.

Read More

• • •
 

April 18, 2008

Open letter to Stephanapolous and Gibson from Will Bunch

Filed under: Uncategorized — webmaster @ 6:55 am

Randi Rhodes read this letter on the air after the ABC debate, and I didn’t hear who it was written by. Someone at DemocraticUnderground posted the link. Will Bunch is a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, and critiques his fellow “journalists”. His blog is a new discovery and I am adding it to the Blogroll on the left.

An open letter to Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos
Dear Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos,

It’s hard to know where to begin with this, less than an hour after you signed off from your Democratic presidential debate here in my hometown of Philadelphia, a televised train wreck that my friend and colleague Greg Mitchell has already called, quite accurately, “a shameful night for the U.S. media.” It’s hard because — like many other Americans — I am still angry at what I just witnessed, so angry that it’s hard to even type accurately because my hands are shaking. Look, I know that “media criticism” — especially when it’s one journalist speaking to another — tends to be a genteel, collegial thing, but there’s no genteel way to say this.

With your performance tonight — your focus on issues that were at best trivial wastes of valuable airtime and at worst restatements of right-wing falsehoods, punctuated by inane “issue” questions that in no way resembled the real world concerns of American voters — you disgraced my profession of journalism, and, by association, me and a lot of hard-working colleagues who do still try to ferret out the truth, rather than worry about who can give us the best deal on our capital gains taxes. But it’s even worse than that. By so badly botching arguably the most critical debate of such an important election, in a time of both war and economic misery, you disgraced the American voters, and in fact even disgraced democracy itself. Indeed, if I were a citizen of one of those nations where America is seeking to “export democracy,” and I had watched the debate, I probably would have said, “no thank you.” Because that was no way to promote democracy.

You implied throughout the broadcast that you wanted to reflect the concerns of voters in Pennsylvania. Well, I’m a Pennsylvanian voter, and so are my neighbors and most of my friends and co-workers. You asked virtually nothing that reflected our everyday issues — trying to fill our gas tanks and save for college at the same time, our crumbling bridges and inadequate mass transit, or the root causes of crime here in Philadelphia. In fact, there almost isn’t enough space — and this is cyberspace, where room is unlimited — to list all the things you could have asked about but did not, from health care to climate change to alternative energy to our policy toward China to the deterioration of Afghanistan to veterans’ benefits to improving education. You ignored virtually everything that just happened in what most historians agree is one of the worst presidencies in American history, including the condoning of torture and the trashing of the Constitution, although to be fair you also ignored the policy concerns of people on the right, like immigration issues.
More at Will Bunch’s Blog Attytood

• • •
 

April 17, 2008

Barack Obama reacts to the “debate” last night which was a disgrace.

Filed under: Barack Obama,Election 2008 — webmaster @ 4:25 pm

I just signed MoveOn’s petition against ABC/Disney this is my comment:

There are no words for what I witnessed. It is why I stopped watching corporate TV a long time ago, except for entertainment. This was not entertainment. Thank you for one thing, Barack Obama was able to demonstrate his limitless grace and charm, and Hillary was able to show the world that no dig is too small on her faustian journey to nowhere.

The petition is here:
Sign the petition

• • •
 

April 15, 2008

Jon Stewart… doesn’t elite mean… good?

Filed under: Barack Obama,Election 2008,Jon Stewart — webmaster @ 6:41 pm

Hillary knocking back a shot…

of crown royal…

Had to add this wonderful clip of Obama on the “elitist issue”. I can not believe that Clinton is using buzz words from the “great right wing conspiracy”. It is very sad. Poor judgement is a too familiar a story, 8 years in.

Obama on whether elitist is code for “uppity”

• • •
 
Next Page »